Variation in Ẹdo Personal Pronouns: A Case of Grammaticalization?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60787/jolan.vol29no1.458Keywords:
Ẹdo language, Grammaticalization, Pronouns, Theta Roles, VariationAbstract
Previous studies contend that the Ẹdo language possesses thirty personal pronouns, using structural case as a primary distinguishing feature. However, because case is not morphologically marked in Ẹdo and many pronouns occur freely across different structural case positions, this paper re-examines the language’s pronominal system to account for its plethora of personal pronouns. Drawing on primary data from naturalistic observations and key informant interviews, alongside content analysis of textual and audiovisual media, the study analyses personal pronouns through the framework of thematic roles. The analysis demonstrates that theta roles - rather than structural case - determine pronominal selection in Ẹdo. Consequently, the study proposes that the grammaticalization of theta roles accounts for the language's multiplicity of personal pronouns. These findings contribute to syntactic and semantic variation studies by demonstrating how theta roles function as a key parameter for differentiating pronominal variants.
References
Abimbola, O., & Taiwo, O. P. (2017). A minimalist description of Aika pronouns. Journal of the Linguistic Association of Nigeria, 20(1), 28–39.
Aboh, E. O. (2016). Grammaticalization: A population factor. In A. Bannink & W. Honselaar (Eds.), From variation to iconicity: Festschrift for Olga Fischer (pp. 1–16). Uitgeverij Pegasus.
Adeola, T. (Producer), & Ogbọmọ, E. (Director). (2010). Aigbedion [Film]. Prolens Movies.
Adger, D., & Smith, J. (2005). Variation and the minimalist programme. In L. Cornips & K. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 149–178). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.265.08adg
Agheyisi, R. N. (1986). An Ẹdo-English dictionary. Ethiope Publishing Corporation.
Chafe, W. L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. University of Chicago Press.
Christensen, T. K., & Jensen, T. J. (2022). Introduction: Analysing and explaining syntactic variation. In T. K. Christensen & T. J. Jensen (Eds.), Explanations in sociosyntactic variation (pp. 1–10). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914697.001
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2022). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (25th ed.). SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com
Ediọnwe, O. A. (Producer). (2016). Benin ascension rituals [Film]. Butterworth Productions.
Elugbe, B. O. (1989). Comparative Edoid. University of Port Harcourt Press.
Everaert, M. B. H., Marelj, M., & Siloni, T. (2012). The theta system: An introduction. In M. B. H. Everaert, M. Marelj, & T. Siloni (Eds.), The theta system: Argument structure at the interface (pp. 1–19). Oxford University Press.
Fábregas, A. (2024). Theories of argument structure: The connection between lexical information and syntactic structure. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 13(2), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.13.2.7302
Güldemann, T. (2018). Historical linguistics and genealogical language classification in Africa. In T. Güldemann (Ed.), The languages and linguistics of Africa (pp. 58–444). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110421668-002
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to government and binding theory (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Haspelmath, M. (2023). Types of clitics in the world’s languages. Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads, 3(2), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-0943/16895
Heine, B., & Narrog, H. (2010). Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 401–424). Oxford University Press.
Heine, B., & Reh, M. (1984). Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Buske.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Howe, S. (2009). Pronoun morphology. The Bulletin of the Central Research Institute, Fukuoka University, 9(7), 1–13.
Imasuen, E. O. (1996). Ẹdo course for schools and colleges (Book 1, 2nd ed.). Aisien Publishers.
Imasuen, E. O. (1998). Languages in contact: The case of Edo and Portuguese. Journal of West African Languages, 27(2), 39–49.
Imasuen, E. O. (2010). Ẹdo course for schools and colleges (Book 2, 2nd ed.). Aisien Publishers.
Japhet, A. S. (2012). The morphosyntax of pronouns in the Ìlàjẹ dialect of Yorùbá [Unpublished MPhil dissertation]. University of Ibadan.
Kibort, A., & Corbett, G. G. (2008). Grammatical features inventory: Typology of grammatical features. University of Surrey. https://doi.org/10.15162/SMG.18/1.16
Matthews, P. H. (2007). Oxford concise dictionary of linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Melzian, H. (1937). A concise dictionary of the Bini language of Southern Nigeria. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
Mensah, E. (2012). Grammaticalization in Nigerian Pidgin. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 17(2), 167–179.
Narrog, H., & Heine, B. (2021). Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Omoregbe, E. M., Evbuomwan, O. O., & Aigbedo, W. I. (2023). Omuso ọghe egiranma Ẹdo. Edukate Publishers.
Omoregie, O. S. B. (1983). Ẹdo grammar for schools and colleges. Thomas Nelson (Nigeria) Limited.
Omoruyi, T. O. (1986). Pronominalization and reflexivization in Ẹdo. Afrika und Übersee, 69, 81–93.
Omozuwa, V. E. (2013). Ẹdo phonetics and phonology. AMBIK Press.
Omozuwa, V. E. (2020). Wa gia gha gbẹn Ẹdo ẹse. Ambik Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of The Linguistic Association of Nigeria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
