Argument preposing in Ibibio

Authors

  • Emmanuel Okon Department of Linguistics & Nigerian Languages University of Uyo
  • Victoria Etim Department of Linguistics & Nigerian Languages University of Calabar
  • Unyime Udoeyo Department of Nigerian Languages College of Education, Afaha Nsit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60787/jolan.vol27no1&2.390

Keywords:

argument , interrogative, left periphery, obligatory, preposing
         Abtract Views | PDF Download: 37 / 23

Abstract

This study examines argument preposing in Ibibio, a Lower-Cross language spoken in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria, from its base-generated position to a case feature position and then to the left periphery of the sentence. It used the Minimalist Program (MP) as its theoretical model to explain the syntactic and semantic causes of argument preposing in overt syntax. According to the MP, sentence derivation is the process of combining meaning and sound while adhering to specific economic rules. Fifty-two sentences were elicited from fourteen native speakers in addition to the researchers’ intuitive knowledge. Findings reveal that interrogative, topicalised, left-dislocated and cleft structures show evidence of argument preposing. The work establishes that Ibibio displays both the in-situ and non-in-situ patterns concerning the position of wh-operators. The preposing of the object wh-operators is obligatorily followed by a base-generated "ke" focus marker. Topic arguments are probed by the ke particle. Left dislocation is characterised by an overt trace in the form of a resumptive pronoun. Clefting process also utilises the ké particle as a relativiser to introduce the clause that modifies the cleft argument in the language. Argument preposing in Ibibio is basically a strategy for focusing.

References

Aboh, E. & Pfau, R. (2011). What’s wh-word got to do with it? In Pola, B. (Ed.), The cartography of syntactic structures. (pp. 91-124). Oxford University Press.

Anyanwu, O. N. (2007). The syntax of Igbo causatives: A minimalist program account. M and J Grand Orbit Communication Ltd. and Emhai Press.

Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. Anderson, S. & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. (pp. 232-286). H.R.W.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris publications.

Chomsky, N. (1986b). Barriers. MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1991). Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (Ed.), Ken Halle: A life in language. (pp. 104-131).MIT Press.

Chomsky, O. (1995). Bare phrase structure. In Webelhuth, G. (Ed.), Government & binding theory and the minimalist Program. (pp. 383-439). MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2015). The minimalist program. MIT Press.

Colins, C. (2002). Eliminating Labels. In S. D. Epsrein & D. Seely (Eds), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. (pp. 42-64). Blackwell.

Cook, V. Newson, M. (2007). Chomsky’s universal grammar: An introduction. Blackwell.

Essien, O. (1990). A grammar of Ibibio language. Ibadan University Press.

Etim, V. E. and Okon, E.A. (2023). Acquisition of negation in the Anaañ child language.

Hornstein, N., Nunes, J & Grohmann, K. (2005). Understanding minimalism. Cambridge University Press.

Lasnik, H. &. Uriagereka, J. (1988). A course in GB syntax. MIT press.

Larson, R. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry. 19, 335-391.

Marantz, A. (1995). The minimalist program. Webelhuth, G. (Ed.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program. (pp. 349-381). Blackwell.

Napoli, D. (1996). Linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Ndimele, O. (2004). The parameters of universal grammar: A government-binding approach. African Educational Services.

Nkemnji, M. (1995). Heavy pied-piping in Nweh. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. Department of Linguistics: University of California.

Nweya, G. (2018). The Igbo clause structure and the cartography of the complementizer phrase domain. Ph.D thesis, University of Ibadan.

Obiamalu, G. (2015). Functional Categories in Igbo: A Minimalist Perspective. M & J Grand Orbit Communication and Emhai Press.

Olaogun, S. (2016). Information structural categories of the ǹjò-kóo language in Akoko North- West of Ondo State, Nigeria. Unpublishd Ph.D thesis, University of Ibadan.

Okon, E. (2012). Argument movement in Ùdá syntax. M.A. University of Uyo.

Okon, E. A. (2023). Minimalist Account on Interrogative Word Movement in Ibibio. UNIUYO Journal of Humanities, 27(2), 1-17.

Radford, A. (1988). Transformational grammar. Cambridge University Press.

Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge University Press.

Radford, A. (2009). Analysing English sentences: A minimalist approach. Cambridge University Press.

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. Haegeman, L. (Ed.) Elements of grammar (pp 281-337). Kluwer.

Rizzi, L. (2003). Locality and left periphery. Structures and beyond. Belleti. (Ed.). The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford University Press.

Thráinsson, H. (2007). Object shift and scrambling. Baltin, M. & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Blackwell.

Trask, R. (1993). A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. Routledge.

Udosen, E & Okon, E. A. (2019). GB syntax on NP movement to argument position in Ùdá” syntax. Journal of Nigerian Languages Project, 1, 37-51.

Udosen, E. & Okon, E. A. (2022). Complementation and headedness in Ibibio Nominal Compounds. In Ekpenyong, M. & I. Udoh (Eds.). Current Issues in Descriptive Linguistics and Digital Humanities. A Festschrift in Honor of Professor Eno-Abasi Essien Urua (pp. 87 - 102). Springer Nature.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-22

How to Cite

Okon, E., Etim, V., & Udoeyo, U. (2024). Argument preposing in Ibibio. Journal of The Linguistic Association of Nigeria, 27(1&2), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.60787/jolan.vol27no1&2.390