Pragmatic Analysis of Conversational Implicature in Krisagbedo’s … a Darkling Plain

Main Article Content

Chioma J. Ikechukwu-Ibe
Chinedu C. Ezebube


The paper examines conversational implicature as it applies in … a Darkling Plain, a novel written by Krisagbedo from the pragmatic point of view. The specific objectives of the study are: to investigate the characteristics of conversational implicature in characters’ conversations, point out instances of implicatures in … a Darkling Plain and analyse the implicated strategies employed in the novel by some characters using nine (9) excerpts. In order to analyse the implicatures in characters’ conversations, the study adopts the theoretical tenets of Conversational Analysis (CA) by Grice (1967). The findings of the paper reveal that there are features that differentiate conversational implicature from conventional implicature and other conversational styles; these features aid understanding during communication. There are instances of implicatures in characters’ conversations in … a Darkling Plain. The study discovers that in everyday parlance, people say not exactly what they have in mind or rather; they indirectly pass across messages, hoping their listeners will understand the actual meanings based on the context of usage. The paper concludes that implicatures, especially conversational implicature is a part and parcel of human speeches which every speaker of a language must understand to ensure the smooth-flowing of every conversation. 

Article Details

How to Cite
J. Ikechukwu-Ibe, C. ., & C. Ezebube, C. . (2020). Pragmatic Analysis of Conversational Implicature in Krisagbedo’s … a Darkling Plain. Journal of The Linguistic Association of Nigeria, 23(2), 31–43. Retrieved from


Agbedo, C. U. (2015). General linguistics: Historical and contemporary perspective. Nsukka: KUMCEE-Ntaeshe Press Inc.

Ahamefula, N. O. (2012). A pragmatic analysis of actions in Krisagbedo’s …a darkling plain. The Nigerian Linguist Festschrift Series 9, 361-369.

Cignetti, L. M. (2015). Pragmatic awareness of conversational implicatures and the usefulness of explicit instruction. Revista Nebrija de Linguistica Aplicada, 19.

Davis, W. (2010). Implicature. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition).

Eitelgeorge, S. F. V., Pouscoulous, N. & Lieven, E. V. M. (2018). Some pieces are missing: Implicature production in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 19(28), 122-135.

Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall

Grice, H. P. (1967). Logic and conversation. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), The logic of Grammar (pp. 64-75). Encino: Dickenson.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Grice, H. P. (1989a). Indicative conditionals. In P. H. Grice (Ed.), Studies in the way of words (pp. 58-85). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Grice, P. (1989b). Further notes on logic and conversation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Hunt, L. W. (2016). Legal speech and implicit content in the law. Ratio Juris, 29(1), 3-22.

Kasmirli, M. (2016). Conversation and contexts. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, Sheffield.

Krisagbedo (2006). … A darkling plain. Enugu: Praise House Publisher.

Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalised conversational implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum Associates.

Marmor, A. (2016). Defeasibility and pragmatic indeterminacy in law. In C. Alessandro & P. Francesca (Eds.), Pragmatics and law: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 15-32). Dordrescht: Springer.

Martin, S. (2013). The dynamics of sense and implicature. PhD thesis, The Ohio State, University.

Potts, C. (2003). Conventional implicatures: A distinguished class of meanings. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces: Studies in theoretical linguistics (pp. 203-216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schutz, A. & Luckmann T. (1974). The structures of the life world. London: Heinemann.

Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: a conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Shardimgaliev, M. (2019). Implicatures in judicial opinions. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 2(32), 391-415.