Obolo Subject Markers

Authors

  • Gladday Ataisi Emiya University of Port Harcourt

Keywords:

Subject markers, clitics, affixes, clifix
         Abtract Views | PDF Download: 58 / 61

Abstract

Subject markers are ubiquitous in Obolo morphology. The ubiquitousness of subject markers in Obolo morphology calls for a linguistic analysis. This study aims to find out the status of Obolo subject markers. This study examines the morphological forms of Obolo subject markers, the distribution of subject markers and provides a morpho-syntactic analysis of subject markers in sentences. The data for this study were collected from native speakers of the language to corroborate the introspective knowledge of the researcher. This study is mainly descriptive. The descriptive method of morpheme-to-morpheme glossing in Linguistics is used to analyse the data
used in this study. The study revealed that subject markers are morphologically conditioned. A morphosyntactic analysis of these subject markers shows that these subject markers can occur with the emphatic forms of personal pronouns or proper nouns. The morphosyntactic analysis also shows that subject markers can retrieve the phi features of dropped subjects. The possibility of dropped subjects makes Obolo a null subject language. The major thrust of this study is the reanalysis of subject markers as clitics against affixes.

Author Biography

Gladday Ataisi Emiya, University of Port Harcourt

 

 

References

Dikken, den Marcel. 2011. Phi-feature inflection and agreement: An introduction. National Language Linguist Theory. 29:857-874 DOI:10.1007/s11049-011-9156-y

Enene, Enene Naaman. 1998. Comparative Inflectional Morphology of the Obolo dialects. Thesis. University of Port Harcourt.

Faraclas, Nicholas G. 1984. A grammar of Obolo. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Haspelmath, Martin and Andrea D. Sims. 2010. Understanding Morphology. Second edition. UK: Hodder Education.

Kari, Ethelbert E. 2002. Distinguishing between clitics and affixes in Degema, Nigeria. African Study Monographs,23(3): 91- 115.

Kari, Ethelbert E. 2005. Degema subject markers: Are they prefixes or proclitics? Journal of West African Languages XXXII. 1-2.

Nikolaeva, Irina. 2005. ‘Modifier-head person concord.’ G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi and S. Scalise (eds.), Morphology and Linguistic Typology, Proceedings of the fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania 21-23, 2003. University of Bologna. Online- http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm/ pp.221-234

Osenova, Petya. n.d. On subject-verb agreement in Bulgarian (An HPSG-based account) The BulTreeBank Project. Online-http://www.BulTreeBank.org

Spencer, Andrew and Ana R. Luis. 2012. Clitics: an introduction. Cambridge: CUP Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. On clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Club.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-01

How to Cite

Ataisi Emiya, G. . (2016). Obolo Subject Markers. Journal of The Linguistic Association of Nigeria. Retrieved from https://jolan.com.ng/index.php/home/article/view/16

Issue

Section

Articles