Content Word Question Formation in Bàtònu

Authors

  • Samson Tella University of Ibadan
  • Simeon Olaogun Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba

Keywords:

Wh- question, Content Word Question, Bàtònū, GB, Split INFL Hypothesis
         Abtract Views | PDF Download: 231 / 109

Abstract

The derivation of wh-questions in English takes a different approach in terms of its realization in Africa languages hence the change in its syntactic reference; content word question (henceforth, CWQ). This does not only affect the name but also its syntactic derivation across languages. So, this paper attempts an analysis of CWQ constructions in Bàtònū. Data for this study were elicited from competent speakers of Bàtònū in Ilesha-Ibaruba and Okuta through interview and observation. The data were then subjected to qualitative analysis using Government and Binding Theory (henceforth, GB) and Split INFL hypothesis as theoretical tools. We observed an inseparable interaction between content words (henceforth, CW) ex situ and the focus marker in the language. This led to a change in the forms of the CWQs in which the final vowels of the CW assimilate completely the features of focus mark á ex-situ. We equally found out that CW constructions in Bàtònū are interrogative focus constructions in that the CWs also carry an interrogative force when realized ex-situ. In other word, Bàtònū attests both content question in situ and ex-situ. Finally, since focus marker plays a significant role especially when a CW is derived ex-situ, it then becomes necessary to attempt a simple illustration of the phonemic function of tones in the formation of syntactic markers such as: class markers and focus markers through a syntagmatic displacement. This in-situ and ex-situ observation made us to run a response test through which it is observed that CWQ in Bàtònū can be answered with a focused construction, a truncated focused construction or a simple NP.

Author Biographies

Samson Tella, University of Ibadan

 

 

Simeon Olaogun, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba

 

 

 

References

Aboh, E.O. (2007). Focused Versus Non-Focused Wh-words. In Enoch O. Aboh, Katharina, H and Malte, Z (eds.) Focus and Grammar:The Contribution of African Languages. Berlin: Mouton. Pp 297-325.

Arokoyo, B (2017) A Survey of Focus Construction in Owe, Published in Current Perspectives in PhonoSyntax and Dialectology. Adika, G. F., Abidemi F. and A. S. Salawu (Eds.) Pp 120-139. Winneba, Ghana: Black Mask Ltd.

Awobuluyi, O. (2013). Eko Girama Ede Yoruba, Osogbo, ATMAN Limited.

Awoyale, Y (1990) ‘Role of Functional Categories in Syntax’. A Paper Presented in the Department of Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University of Ilorin Seminar Series.

Bamgbose A. (1990). Fonoloji ati Girama Yoruba. Ibadan:University Press Limited.

Black, C. (1998). A Step-by-Step Introduction to GB Theory of Syntax. Notes on Linguistic 73: 5– 12

Cheng, L.: 1991, On the Typology of Wh-Questions, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Chomsky, N.: 1977, "On WH-movement," in P. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmaijan (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York.

Chomsky, N (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris

Chomsky, Noam (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

Cole, P. and G. Hermon: 1994, “Is there LF wh-movement?” Linguistic Inquiry 25, 239-262

Baker, J (2004) Wh-in-situ, SynCom Case #XXX

Bayer, J and Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen (2004) Wh-in-situ SynCom Case #77

Drubig Bernhard Hans (2000) ‘Towards a Typology of Focus and Focus Constructions’. Seminar für Englische Philologie Wilhelmstr. 5072074 Tübingen, Germany

Karttunen, L.: 1977, "Syntax and semantics of questions," Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3-44

Lamidi, M.T and Akinmurele, A.T, (2016). Relative Construction and Wh-Question in Edo and their Learning Implication on ESL Learners. In Oye Taiwo and Lendzemo Yuka eds, New Findings in West African Languages and Literature, in Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the West African Linguistics Society (WALS/SLAO)

Ndimele, O. (1992). The Parameters of Universal Grammar (A Government and Binding Approach. Owerri, Nigeria. African Educational Service.

Olabode, A and Olaogun S, (2016). Interrogatives in Iyinno: A Unified Analysis. In Oye Taiwo and Lendzemo Yuka eds, New Findings in West African Languages and Literature, in Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the West African Linguistics Society (WALS/SLAO)

Ouhalla, J. (1999). Introducing Transformational Grammar from Principle and Parameters Theory of Minimalism. 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Limited.

Haegeman, L. (1991) Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge Mass Basil Blackwell Inc.

Pollock, J. Y. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 20, Pp 365 - 424

Radford (1988). Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge, CUP Samuel A. I (2013) Focus and Constituent Question Formation In Dagbani, Ghana Journal of Linguistics , Winneba 2.1: 39-62

Sanusi, I. O. (2001). The Syntax of Double Object Construction in Bàtònū Ph.D Thesis. University of Ilorin.

Tella, S.A. (2014). Empty Category in Bàtònū Language. M.A.Thesis Department of Linguistics and African Languages, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-01

How to Cite

Tella, S. ., & Olaogun, S. . (2019). Content Word Question Formation in Bàtònu. Journal of The Linguistic Association of Nigeria. Retrieved from https://jolan.com.ng/index.php/home/article/view/15

Issue

Section

Articles